Med school is SO long - why spend another few years getting a PhD? I've gotten this question a lot since I started med school. Like applying to straight MD programs - there are plenty of good BS reasons to apply to MD PhD programs. [The REAL reason I want to go to med school]
|
MD/PhD - the rough outline by year |
Sidenote - if you're wondering what MD/PhD programs are - see image on right - they are essentially med school (MD) and school for scientists (PhD) so we combine medical and scientist training. We exchange spending a few extra years in school with free tuition.
Here on sidenote, we give the people what they want. Once we pare away all the BS of med school admissions, there are 3 reasons why I chose to pursue two doctorates, when I would have been equally as useful with an MD.
1- The incredible tution bill of med school. The average 2010 med school graduate left with $160,000 in debt. 15% of all med school graduates left with a quarter million dollars of loan money. And when you graduate med school you're still a resident which means you make in the neighborhood of $50,000, not quite doctor money. And don't forget that loan money is definitely not interest protected. It keeps growing and growing and..
As an MD/PhD student, the government pays my medical school tuition bill. Thanks tax dollars!
|
running gels gets a bad rap.. but I love science |
During my admissions year I kept hearing that the financial incentive to pursue an MD/PhD wasn't worth it, but it still seems smart to me. Spend 3-4 years working in a lab, which I love, and come out with a free MD, which my wife loves. Everyone wins.
2- I needed a backup plan. One day, I really want to be a scientist and run a mega lab to the tune of 20+ scientists, Cell papers by the month, and grant money flowing in like Brandon Roy's bank account. The point is - I only want to be a scientist if I can be a good one.
If you've ever worked in a lab you know the 40 year old burned out postdoc that's bitter at the research world for screwing over his opportunities to publish in Science/Nature/Cell and get independent grants. You also know that guy questions his life on a daily basis - should he quit and go into advertising? teaching?
|
great book |
I didn't want that to be me, but frankly it's only so much in my hands. Science is a volatile career, and a high impact publication is usually the result of right-place-right-time phenomenon. (See Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers).
I really want to have a family some day - preferably sooner rather than later - so I wanted to make sure I had a viable backup plan before I tried to launch a risky career in science/academia. At the end of the day I want to do science so I can use my brain to help people, so I figured being a doctor would be a good alternative - still intellectual and still helps people.
3- I believe I do things right and other people don't. Don't hate me for it. I despise med school because all we're doing right now is learning the status quo and how medicine has been done for years. I know we have to learn this because we need to pass boards.. but it is BORING. Sidenote - when I run academic medicine we will be done with standardized tests and memorizing rote BS. Instead med students will learn, you know, actual medicine.
I'm a cynical med student, and I know in 6 yrs I won't be the kind of intern that's going to see the medical world and accept it at face value. I know I'll be a pissed off resident, and a pissed off attending. There's a lot to be cynical about in science, but at least science is trying to come up with new solutions. I wanted to be part of a world that asked, what if we could come up with a better way to do this?
Overall conclusions.. perks to the MD/PhD - it saves $ and you get to do science.
See you on the other side,
from ken